Re: [PATCH] Add Strong APA test

Hi, Sorry, I left the meeting early. It was earlier : > SET_PRIORITY( T2,P(2), T2, T0, T1), but now after checking thoroughly, I can confirm that it ought to be (because of the way affinities are set and checked while running the get_lowest_scheduled logic) : SET_PRIORITY( T2,P(2), T2, T1,

Re: [PATCH] Add Strong APA test

Hi Richi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:52 AM Richi Dubey wrote: > > Hi, > > I would request someone to please verify if this patch looks correct since I > am testing my code on this test. The logic is taken from the paper and I was > wondering if the reset function is handled correctly in this tes

Re: [PATCH] Add Strong APA test

Hi, I would request someone to please verify if this patch looks correct since I am testing my code on this test. The logic is taken from the paper and I was wondering if the reset function is handled correctly in this test because I still h

Re: [PATCH] Add Strong APA test 02

Hi, This is the required test case based on the paper ( https://people.mpi-sws.org/~bbb/papers/pdf/rtss14f.pdf) that tests if the Strong APA scheduler is working as intended. I have checked and this compiles with no warnings/errors. Thanks. Richi. On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:23 PM Richi Dubey wro