Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-11-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 8/11/17 2:18 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > Nothing specifically. Just noting that the GCC community has been testing > > and sending results to a mailing list for a LONG time. They have > developed > > a process and use cases. It is doubt

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-11-07 Thread Chris Johns
On 8/11/17 2:18 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Nothing specifically. Just noting that the GCC community has been testing > and sending results to a mailing list for a LONG time. They have developed > a process and use cases. It is doubtful that we will find a use case they > haven't already encounte

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-11-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 8/11/17 2:01 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > I mentioned earlier that GCC has a tool in contrib/ to send test > results. It has > > been around a long time and should be a good place to look for use > cases. > > Sure, but I would need to fi

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-11-07 Thread Chris Johns
On 8/11/17 2:01 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > I mentioned earlier that GCC has a tool in contrib/ to send test results. It > has > been around a long time and should be a good place to look for use cases.  Sure, but I would need to figure out a complicated shell script or something else to know

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-11-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Nov 7, 2017 8:57 AM, "Chris Johns" wrote: On 7/11/17 6:01 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/11/17 23:03, Chris Johns wrote: >> $ cat ~/.mailrc | grep chrisj >> setfrom=chr...@rtems.org >> > > With the sudo, I have to add this file to the root user. Yes this is correct. There is the `MAILRC`

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-11-07 Thread Chris Johns
On 7/11/17 6:01 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/11/17 23:03, Chris Johns wrote: >> $ cat ~/.mailrc | grep chrisj >> setfrom=chr...@rtems.org >> > > With the sudo, I have to add this file to the root user. Yes this is correct. There is the `MAILRC` environment var which can point to a .mailrc b

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-11-06 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 06/11/17 23:03, Chris Johns wrote: On 06/11/2017 21:20, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 27/10/17 07:13, Chris Johns wrote: On 26/10/2017 18:50, Sebastian Huber wrote: with the change to the INI format files, the target_pretest_command target_exe_filter_command disappeared. Oh I changed some

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-11-06 Thread Chris Johns
On 06/11/2017 21:20, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 27/10/17 07:13, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 26/10/2017 18:50, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> with the change to the INI format files, the >>> >>> target_pretest_command >>> target_exe_filter_command >>> >>> disappeared. >> Oh I changed some names as part of

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-11-06 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 27/10/17 07:13, Chris Johns wrote: On 26/10/2017 18:50, Sebastian Huber wrote: with the change to the INI format files, the target_pretest_command target_exe_filter_command disappeared. Oh I changed some names as part of a clean up. I am not sure how I can invoke the tester for a board u

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-10-30 Thread Chris Johns
On 28/10/2017 00:21, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Chris, > > thanks for your hints. This ser2net and the IO via telnet is really nice. I am > now able to run the tests on a board with U-Boot. > Excellent. I am looking forward to see results if you can post them. :) With a Raspberry Pi powered

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-10-27 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Chris, thanks for your hints. This ser2net and the IO via telnet is really nice. I am now able to run the tests on a board with U-Boot. U-Boot has a "tftpdstport" option. Maybe this can be used to avoid running the rtems-test as root. There is a problem on some tests with mixed output

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-10-26 Thread Chris Johns
On 26/10/2017 18:50, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > with the change to the INI format files, the > > target_pretest_command > target_exe_filter_command > > disappeared. Oh I changed some names as part of a clean up. > I am not sure how I can invoke the tester for a board using U-Boot > connected v

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-10-26 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Chris, with the change to the INI format files, the target_pretest_command target_exe_filter_command disappeared. I am not sure how I can invoke the tester for a board using U-Boot connected via TTY or telnet. Do you have an example command line? -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains Gmb

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-10-23 Thread Chris Johns
On 23/10/2017 17:12, Sebastian Huber wrote: > I would like to try the RTEMS tester on a Altera Cyclone V board with U-Boot. > I > can turn on/off the power via a network controlled power switch. The console > is > connected to a Raspberry Pi. It can also run the RTEMS tester. What do I > need

Re: RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-10-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Chris, I would like to try the RTEMS tester on a Altera Cyclone V board with U-Boot. I can turn on/off the power via a network controlled power switch.  The console is connected to a Raspberry Pi.  It can also run the RTEMS tester.  What do I need to add to get it running? -- Sebastian

RTEMS Tier Allocations.

2017-10-21 Thread Chris Johns
Hi, This post is the start of the process to formally define the tiers for RTEMS. The RTEMS Tiers helps the project and you understand the current tested state of RTEMS in an open and public manner. It is important we do this and we get valid results. Up to this starting I have made a bit of gues