On 03/01/2019 17:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 5:33 AM Sebastian Huber
<mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
Hello Joel,
On 19/12/2018 13:21, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> I am not sure if the copyright notice of the new RT
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 5:33 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Joel,
>
> On 19/12/2018 13:21, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > I am not sure if the copyright notice of the new RTEMS Software
> > Engineering Handbook is correct:
> >
Hello Joel,
On 19/12/2018 13:21, Sebastian Huber wrote:
I am not sure if the copyright notice of the new RTEMS Software
Engineering Handbook is correct:
COPYRIGHT (c) 1988 - 2015.
On-Line Applications Research Corporation (OAR).
COPYRIGHT (c) 2016-2018.
RTEMS Foundation, The
On 19/12/2018 23:21, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> we have
>
> RTEMS User Manual
> RTEMS Source Builder
> RTEMS Classic API Guide
> RTEMS BSP and Driver Guide
> RTEMS POSIX API Guide
> RTEMS POSIX 1003.1 Compliance Guide
> RTEMS Filesystem Design Guide
> RTEMS Networking User Manual
> RTEMS Shell Guide
Development Environment Guide
RTEMS Eclipse Manual
maybe we should rename all the Manuals into Guides.
I am not sure if the copyright notice of the new RTEMS Software
Engineering Handbook is correct:
COPYRIGHT (c) 1988 - 2015.
On-Line Applications Research Corporation (OAR).
COPYRIGHT (c
gh that "git send-mail" refuses to send them.
> In general, the patch set should be accepted in entirety or work continue
> in my personal repository -- which would be tragic.
>
> This patch set adds an initial draft of the RTEMS Software Engineering
> Handbook as proposed
:) Look through what I got converted. The potential tasks should be pretty
obvious. If not, I didn't do what I think I did.
I will review the doc for GCI tasks tomorrow and Gedare and I will try to
get them published.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 7:00 PM Shashvat Jain
wrote:
> Scott has done a aweso
Scott has done a awesome job , would love to do the task : )
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:22 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi
>
> Scott Zemerick of NASA IV&V did a review of NASA's quality standard and
> DO-178B and tried to find a way for open source projects to provide
> documents meeting the spir
Hi
Scott Zemerick of NASA IV&V did a review of NASA's quality standard and
DO-178B and tried to find a way for open source projects to provide
documents meeting the spirit and intent of those standards in a way that is
palatable and not soul crushing for an open source project. He presented
about
