On 17/1/19 7:15 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> With respect to an example RTEMS application. Should we
>
> (1) suggest to check out the examples repository and start from here, or
>
> (2) should we provide a very simple Makefile based project?
>
> I tend to option (2) and just mention that the
On 17/01/2019 07:36, Chris Johns wrote:
On 17/1/19 5:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 17/01/2019 06:45, Chris Johns wrote:
On 14/1/19 5:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
I added a build of the partially restructured user manual here:
https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/user.pdf
Any HTML
On 17/1/19 5:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 17/01/2019 06:45, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 14/1/19 5:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> I added a build of the partially restructured user manual here:
>>>
>>> https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/user.pdf
>>>
>> Any HTML?
>
> https://ftp.rtems
On 17/01/2019 06:45, Chris Johns wrote:
Board Support Packages
The BSPs. I have been wondering if the BSP names are suitable
heading or do we want something more formal if that is even
possible?
The heading is now " ()".
This should make it easy to find.
Hmm I am not sure, for so
On 17/01/2019 06:45, Chris Johns wrote:
Do we want to use "tool chain" or "tool set" or "tools" for the RTEMS things
running on the host computer?
Yeah good question. A "tool chain" seems to have a meaning, a compile etc, a
"tool set" is an RSB based term and "tools" is overloaded with the rtems
On 17/01/2019 06:45, Chris Johns wrote:
On 14/1/19 5:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
I added a build of the partially restructured user manual here:
https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/user.pdf
Any HTML?
https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/user/index.html
As an aside in the
On 14/1/19 5:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> I added a build of the partially restructured user manual here:
>
> https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/user.pdf
>
Any HTML?
As an aside in the copyright block I wrote of lot of initial parts of this
manual and then have been adding pieces mo
I added a build of the partially restructured user manual here:
https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/user.pdf
On 13/01/2019 23:03, Chris Johns wrote:
On 11/1/19 8:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
At which position in the manual should it be placed? I think we should organize
the chapters
On 11/1/19 8:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> At which position in the manual should it be placed? I think we should
> organize the chapters according to the relevance for new users and how the
> are used later during application development. I would use the RSB chapter as
> a reference chapter c
- Am 10. Jan 2019 um 0:51 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org:
> On 10/1/19 3:41 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> I'm OK with this proposal. We used to include quite messy details about how
>> to
>> bootstrap your own GCC in the user manual. This is a bit nicer. ;) At the
>> maturity of RSB now,
gt;
> https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/rsb/index.html
>
> I think it would make sense to move the RSB documentation into the user
> manual as a chapter. If you are new to RTEMS, then dealing with the RSB
> is one of the first things you have to do. I think it is easie
stian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the RSB has currently its own manual in the documentation set:
>
> https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/rsb/index.html
>
> I think it would make sense to move the RSB documentation into the user
> manual as a chapter. If you
Hello,
the RSB has currently its own manual in the documentation set:
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/rsb/index.html
I think it would make sense to move the RSB documentation into the user
manual as a chapter. If you are new to RTEMS, then dealing with the RSB
is one of the first
Hi,
I found a broken link in the source builder documentation:
https://docs.rtems.org/rsb/#_windows
The ready to go windows tools link doesn't work.
Hope this helps,
Mohammed Khoory
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman
14 matches
Mail list logo
