On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 19/04/2016 02:34, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> I didn't quite follow. Is this to determine whether RSB should do
>> something?
>
>
> I am sorry, I should have provided more of a context.
>
>> I guess this is caused by some bootstrap or configur
On 19/04/2016 08:11, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
This lets us know if the repo is clean or dirty and if changes have been
made. It helps us support users and it can be part of the evidence in an
audit.
For this specific use, I would not call it modi
On 19/04/2016 02:34, Gedare Bloom wrote:
I didn't quite follow. Is this to determine whether RSB should do
something?
I am sorry, I should have provided more of a context.
I guess this is caused by some bootstrap or configure that
creates untracked files in a repo?
Yes.
What does it matt
I didn't quite follow. Is this to determine whether RSB should do
something? I guess this is caused by some bootstrap or configure that
creates untracked files in a repo?
What does it matter?
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment the RSB says untracked files
Hi,
At the moment the RSB says untracked files in a git repo is modified.
Is this valid or this is a distraction? For example if I have 'x' as a
file in the repo it is seen as untracked and so modified and nothing in
the RSB has been changed.
I am currently leaning to not modified.
Chris
__
