Re: RFC: PowerPC bsp_specs Clean Up Question

2017-12-21 Thread Chris Johns
On 22/12/2017 08:30, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Dec 21, 2017 3:03 PM, "Chris Johns" > wrote: > On 22/12/2017 02:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > I'm not opposed to this but it requires even more delicate editing that > I > can't > > easily test. > > If som

Re: RFC: PowerPC bsp_specs Clean Up Question

2017-12-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Dec 21, 2017 3:03 PM, "Chris Johns" wrote: On 22/12/2017 02:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I'm not opposed to this but it requires even more delicate editing that I can't > easily test. If something breaks and it is reported we can look at fixing it. If something breaks and it is not reported is

Re: RFC: PowerPC bsp_specs Clean Up Question

2017-12-21 Thread Chris Johns
On 22/12/2017 02:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I'm not opposed to this but it requires even more delicate editing that I > can't > easily test. If something breaks and it is reported we can look at fixing it. If something breaks and it is not reported is it broken? ;) > We can get rid of bsp_specs

Re: RFC: PowerPC bsp_specs Clean Up Question

2017-12-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Dec 21, 2017 1:16 AM, "Chris Johns" wrote: On 21/12/17 6:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 12/12/17 02:54, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> Many of the PowerPC BSPs uses a shared linker script. That's good. >> Unfortunately, there is variation in the start symbol and the use of a "-u" >> (e.g. undefin

Re: RFC: PowerPC bsp_specs Clean Up Question

2017-12-20 Thread Chris Johns
On 21/12/17 6:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 12/12/17 02:54, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> Many of the PowerPC BSPs uses a shared linker script. That's good. >> Unfortunately, there is variation in the start symbol and the use of a "-u" >> (e.g. undefined) symbol in the bsp_specs. I had initially tho

Re: RFC: PowerPC bsp_specs Clean Up Question

2017-12-20 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 12/12/17 02:54, Joel Sherrill wrote: Many of the PowerPC BSPs uses a shared linker script. That's good. Unfortunately, there is variation in the start symbol and the use of a "-u" (e.g. undefined) symbol in the bsp_specs. I had initially thought I would add the start symbol and any use of -u

Re: RFC: PowerPC bsp_specs Clean Up Question

2017-12-12 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Dec 12, 2017 10:08 AM, "Gedare Bloom" wrote: On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > Many of the PowerPC BSPs uses a shared linker script. That's good. > Unfortunately, there is variation in the start symbol and the use of a "-u" > (e.g. undefined) symbol in the bsp_spe

Re: RFC: PowerPC bsp_specs Clean Up Question

2017-12-12 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > Many of the PowerPC BSPs uses a shared linker script. That's good. > Unfortunately, there is variation in the start symbol and the use of a "-u" > (e.g. undefined) symbol in the bsp_specs. I had initially thought I would > add the star

RFC: PowerPC bsp_specs Clean Up Question

2017-12-11 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi Many of the PowerPC BSPs uses a shared linker script. That's good. Unfortunately, there is variation in the start symbol and the use of a "-u" (e.g. undefined) symbol in the bsp_specs. I had initially thought I would add the start symbol and any use of -u to the linkcmds (EXTERN). But now I am