On 09/12/16 14:17, Kirspel, Kevin wrote:
LIBBSD has the poll() functionality. In order for the pipe to be polled then
it needs functionality that is only found in LIBBSD. I started off using the
pipe in the RTEMS tree. I even added the poll handler to return the correct
revents. The proble
[mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Huber
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 3:44 AM
To: devel@rtems.org
Subject: Re: QT 5.8 Port
Hello Kevin,
we already have a (broken) pipe support in RTEMS
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https
Hello Kevin,
we already have a (broken) pipe support in RTEMS
https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/libcsupport/src/pipe.c
What is the befit of using the FreeBSD pipe implementation?
On 07/12/16 19:49, Kirspel, Kevin wrote:
I’m porting QT 5.8 to RTEMS 4.12 and rtems-libbsd. I had to add p
On Dec 7, 2016 1:49 PM, "Kirspel, Kevin" wrote:
I’m porting QT 5.8 to RTEMS 4.12 and rtems-libbsd. I had to add pipe
support to rtems-libbsd. I would like to submit the pipe patch but the
“git diff” is long due to the fact that the diff includes the entire file
contents of the modified sys_pipe
-1642
Fax: (770)-510-4445
From: Jennifer Averett [mailto:jennifer.aver...@oarcorp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 1:56 PM
To: Kirspel, Kevin
Subject: RE: QT 5.8 Port
Just a guess but you have probably converted the file to dos format thus the
entire file looks different
run dos2unix on th
