Sorry as I sent this I could see the subject and 7M.
Chris
On 9/2/2024 1:33 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 8/2/2024 9:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 08.02.24 11:43, Cedric Berger wrote:
>>> On 08.02.2024 11:09, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08.02.24 10:53, Cedric Berger wrote:
>
> This
On 8/2/2024 9:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 08.02.24 11:43, Cedric Berger wrote:
>> On 08.02.2024 11:09, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 08.02.24 10:53, Cedric Berger wrote:
This would also simplify the context switching code, by centralizing of the
saving of the FPU context in RT
On 08.02.24 11:43, Cedric Berger wrote:
Hello Sebastian,
On 08.02.2024 11:09, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Cedric,
On 08.02.24 10:53, Cedric Berger wrote:
Hello,
I've a question: does RTEMS really wants to support FPU operations in
ISRs?
Because if the answer is "no", then I believe tha
Hello Sebastian,
On 08.02.2024 11:09, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Cedric,
On 08.02.24 10:53, Cedric Berger wrote:
Hello,
I've a question: does RTEMS really wants to support FPU operations in
ISRs?
Because if the answer is "no", then I believe that we could simplify
the RTEMS code (and fo
Hello Cedric,
On 08.02.24 10:53, Cedric Berger wrote:
Hello,
I've a question: does RTEMS really wants to support FPU operations in ISRs?
Because if the answer is "no", then I believe that we could simplify the
RTEMS code (and for me the mental model of the whole thing) by running
the FPU wit
Hello,
I've a question: does RTEMS really wants to support FPU operations in ISRs?
Because if the answer is "no", then I believe that we could simplify the
RTEMS code (and for me the mental model of the whole thing) by running
the FPU with both FPCCR.ASPEN and FPCCR.LSPEN = 0.
This mean that
