On 9/25/2014 9:08 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 25/09/14 16:01, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> I thought at one point, we had populated the new stack with
>> the checksum code from the old stack for the highly optimized
>> cases. Was the PowerPC one where we just trusted their new
>> code and our old c
On 25/09/14 16:01, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I thought at one point, we had populated the new stack with
the checksum code from the old stack for the highly optimized
cases. Was the PowerPC one where we just trusted their new
code and our old code was more optimized?
FreeBSD no longer uses optimized
Thank you for posting this detailed analysis. This is all I was
asking for. I knew you had to have some hard data to want
that change.
I thought at one point, we had populated the new stack with
the checksum code from the old stack for the highly optimized
cases. Was the PowerPC one where we just
Hello,
I used simple FTP transfers to/from the target to measure the TCP performance
of the new network stack on a PowerPC MPC8309. The new network stack is a port
from FreeBSD 9.2. It is highly optimized for SMP and uses fine grained
locking. For uni-processor systems this is not a benefit
