Great ! I will add this to my application. Parallely I was looking for
some other BSP like this. Looks like last year André added support for
SD card by adding the SDHCI and MMC/SD bus drivers from libBSD
successfully
(https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015/Final_Report#AndreMarques:RaspberryPiLow
The Pi 1/B+ would be a good model to start the USB development with.
I have actually not built the BSD lib myself. But I think this is the place
to start:
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/tree/libbsd.txt
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/tree/README.waf
Looks like the arm/realview_pbx_a9_qemu B
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Alan Cudmore wrote:
> Hi Deval,
> Your proposal looks good. I would suggest adding a step where you build a
> known BSP with BSD lib support. It will help you become familiar with the
> development process.
Thanks for the suggestion, Alan. I will be adding this t
Any further comments are appreciated.
On 18 March 2016 at 15:59, Darshit Shah wrote:
>
>
> On 18 March 2016 at 14:48, Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 18/03/16 14:38, Darshit Shah wrote:
>>
>>> > "schedulable task sets would miss their deadlines since
Hi Deval,
Your proposal looks good. I would suggest adding a step where you build a
known BSP with BSD lib support. It will help you become familiar with the
development process.
You should also address which Raspberry Pi model you will support. Now that
there are so many Raspberry Pi models, it mi
Hello,
I have updated my draft proposal and shared on the tracking page. I'm
sharing it here as well. https://goo.gl/QQiAf6
Sorry, I was busy with my Mid-Semester exams, could not update earlier.
Since this is a draft proposal, it may not be completely polished yet.
I'd appreciate any comments o
On 16/03/16 22:11, Chris Johns wrote:
On 16/03/2016 23:01, Darshit Shah wrote:
I have updated my draft proposal with a basic timeline for things that
need to be done. The link is shared on the tracking page and has been
submitted via the program website as well. I'm sharing it here as well:
ht
On 18 March 2016 at 14:48, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 18/03/16 14:38, Darshit Shah wrote:
>
>> > "schedulable task sets would miss their deadlines since it does not
>> consider
>> > migrating high priority tasks"
>> >
>> > I think this is not correct. The
On 16/03/2016 23:01, Darshit Shah wrote:
I have updated my draft proposal with a basic timeline for things that
need to be done. The link is shared on the tracking page and has been
submitted via the program website as well. I'm sharing it here as well:
https://goo.gl/UmgS61
Since this is a draf
On 18/03/16 14:38, Darshit Shah wrote:
> "schedulable task sets would miss their deadlines since it does not
consider
> migrating high priority tasks"
>
> I think this is not correct. The current APA scheduler should implement
> strong APA. However, it may iterate several times over all (!) re
I have updated my draft proposal with a basic timeline for things that
need to be done. The link is shared on the tracking page and has been
submitted via the program website as well. I'm sharing it here as well:
https://goo.gl/UmgS61
Since this is a draft proposal, it may not be completely polish
On 18 March 2016 at 09:43, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 16/03/16 22:11, Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> On 16/03/2016 23:01, Darshit Shah wrote:
>>>
>>> I have updated my draft proposal with a basic timeline for things that
>>> need to be done. The link is shared o
On 03/10, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Joel might answer about the state of the scheduling simulator.
@Joel, any thoughts / inputs on the state of the scheduling simulator
would be very helpful. I'm currently trying to come up with a draft
timeline for review, but this is a blocking factor. I've cloned
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Joel might answer about the state of the scheduling simulator.
>
> I believe you eventually have to copy-paste your application into a
> form, so it is better if you stick to plain text. I don't even know if
> you can put images in. You may op
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Deval Shah wrote:
>> Hello everyone!
>>
>> I went through the links and blogs of the SD card and USB/Ethernet
>> project for Raspberry PI. I would like to work for the USB/Ethernet
>> support project.
>>
>> I
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Deval Shah wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I went through the links and blogs of the SD card and USB/Ethernet
> project for Raspberry PI. I would like to work for the USB/Ethernet
> support project.
>
> I have prepared a draft of the timeline as follows:
>
> Acceptanc
Hello everyone!
I went through the links and blogs of the SD card and USB/Ethernet
project for Raspberry PI. I would like to work for the USB/Ethernet
support project.
I have prepared a draft of the timeline as follows:
Acceptance Waiting Period:
Understanding previous year's GSOC work
First Ha
Joel might answer about the state of the scheduling simulator.
I believe you eventually have to copy-paste your application into a
form, so it is better if you stick to plain text. I don't even know if
you can put images in. You may optionally link to a generated PDF,
too.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at
Hi,
I've been a little busy with my semester end exams and other things
recently. But I have spent time looking into the RTEMS Priority
Scheduler with Processor Affinities and the paper mentioned in the trac
ticket.
At this point, I have a decent understanding of the paper and its
algorithm
Hello Jan and Deval,
Às 20:24 de 29-02-2016, Jan Sommer escreveu:
Hi,
If you take a look here:
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015#StudentsSummerofCodeTrackingTable you
can find the links to the reports and repositories of the previous GSoC.
Yurii Shevtsov was doing the work on the Etherne
Hi,
If you take a look here:
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015#StudentsSummerofCodeTrackingTable you
can find the links to the reports and repositories of the previous GSoC.
Yurii Shevtsov was doing the work on the Ethernet/USB part for the pi.
Andre Marques worked on the SPI and SD-Card d
It looks like there are more useful things in pipeline before raspberry pi
cam support.
Can anybody give me pointers/links to refer for porting ethernet support
and SD card support?
On Thursday 18 February 2016, soja-li...@aries.uberspace.de <
soja-li...@aries.uberspace.de> wrote:
> Am 2016-02-
Am 2016-02-18 01:26, schrieb Joel Sherrill:
On Feb 17, 2016 6:17 PM, "André Marques"
wrote:
[...]
Was i2c fully delivered for the new driver framework? I don't recall
off-hand.
Yes the i2c driver for the Pi uses the new (linux-based) i2c
framework.
10-bit addressing is untested because
On Feb 17, 2016 6:17 PM, "André Marques"
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
>
> Às 23:27 de 17-02-2016, Gedare Bloom escreveu:
>>
>> CC: Alan, Andre, Pavel
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Deval Shah
wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> My name is Deval Shah. I'm a final year undergrad student in
>>> Electri
Hello all,
Às 23:27 de 17-02-2016, Gedare Bloom escreveu:
CC: Alan, Andre, Pavel
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Deval Shah wrote:
Hello,
My name is Deval Shah. I'm a final year undergrad student in
Electrical and Electronics at Bits-Pilani Hyderabad Campus.
I'd like to be a part of the RTE
CC: Alan, Andre, Pavel
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Deval Shah wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Deval Shah. I'm a final year undergrad student in
> Electrical and Electronics at Bits-Pilani Hyderabad Campus.
> I'd like to be a part of the RTEMS project for GSoC 2016.
>
> Sometime back I interac
Hi Darshit,
today I stumbled over your pre-GSoC-activities and I really appreciate
them. Since our company (especially Sebastian) were (and again will be)
working to improve the SMP part of RTEMS, we really would appreciate
staying in contact with you. Since we are located in Germany near
mu
On 17 January 2016 at 17:50, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
>>
>> I agree. A SMP Scheduling based project would be a nice match for me.
>>
>> In fact, as suggested earlier, ticket #2510, about the implementing
>> arbitrary processor affinities soun
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> I agree. A SMP Scheduling based project would be a nice match for me.
>
> In fact, as suggested earlier, ticket #2510, about the implementing
> arbitrary processor affinities sounds rather interesting to me. I've
> been spending some time goi
I agree. A SMP Scheduling based project would be a nice match for me.
In fact, as suggested earlier, ticket #2510, about the implementing
arbitrary processor affinities sounds rather interesting to me. I've
been spending some time going through the paper once again, and soon
I'll try and come up w
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> On 15 January 2016 at 16:47, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> >> Hi Team,
> >>
> >> My name is Darshit Shah and I'd like to (potentially) be a part of the
> >> RTEMS project for GSoC 2016. I kn
Considering your relationship with Dr. Brandenburg, you should
consider working on our SMP scheduling projects. Condition Variables
is part of that as well, and you may consider it. Sebastian Huber is
the best technical point-of-contact for the current state on both of
these, and he will (hopefully
On 15 January 2016 at 16:47, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> My name is Darshit Shah and I'd like to (potentially) be a part of the
>> RTEMS project for GSoC 2016. I know that the organization applications
>> open only next month, but I
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> My name is Darshit Shah and I'd like to (potentially) be a part of the
> RTEMS project for GSoC 2016. I know that the organization applications
> open only next month, but I'm assuming that you will apply again this
> year and be
34 matches
Mail list logo
