Hello,
I updated the documentation to reflect the recent changes (removal of
Doorstop usage):
https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/user.pdf
https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/eng.pdf
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lis
On 21/04/2020 19:15, Gedare Bloom wrote:
A Doorstop installation is no longer required. The build specification
can be maintained with a text editor. It could be useful to add a "./waf
verify-spec" command to verify that the build specification items are sane.
I suggest opening a ticket for ve
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 6:14 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> as a follow up of the issues mentioned here
>
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-April/059472.html
>
> I modified the build system specification to remove the use of
> Doorstop-specific features. This includes the fo
Hello,
as a follow up of the issues mentioned here
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-April/059472.html
I modified the build system specification to remove the use of
Doorstop-specific features. This includes the following attributes:
* active
* derived
* header
* level
* normative
Hello,
I changed the RTEMS version to 6 and removed the bsp_specs in the branch
with the new build system:
https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems.git/log/?h=build
The latest unstable RTEMS 6 tools from the RSB are now required to work
with the new build system and GCC.
__
