Hello,
This is a follow-up message since activity on this thread has stopped a
couple of days ago.
Thanks,
Niteesh.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:49 AM Niteesh G. S. wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:59 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 9:14 AM Niteesh G. S.
>> wrote:
>> >
>>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:59 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 9:14 AM Niteesh G. S.
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-June/060145.html
> > As agreed on the above mail I have started to create patches based
> > on the new build system. Bu
On 29/06/2020 19:39, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 29/06/2020 17:13, Niteesh G. S. wrote:
>
>> 2) Is it possible to have two same files one in RTEMS and other in
>> RTEMS-libBSD
>> without collision? At least with different install paths?
>> For eg: The openfirm.h in RTEMS under something like
>> li
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:47 PM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> your header files are in the wrong place. Architecture and BSP
> independent header files which need to be installed should be under
> "cpukit/include".
For libfreebsd, this means we
On 29/06/2020 17:13, Niteesh G. S. wrote:
2) Is it possible to have two same files one in RTEMS and other in
RTEMS-libBSD
without collision? At least with different install paths?
For eg: The openfirm.h in RTEMS under something like
libfreebsd/dev/ofw/openfirm.h
And the open in libBSD as it is
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 9:14 AM Niteesh G. S. wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-June/060145.html
> As agreed on the above mail I have started to create patches based
> on the new build system. But I encountered a few issues related to
> the inclusion of header file
Hello,
your header files are in the wrong place. Architecture and BSP
independent header files which need to be installed should be under
"cpukit/include".
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello,
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-June/060145.html
As agreed on the above mail I have started to create patches based
on the new build system. But I encountered a few issues related to
the inclusion of header files. I am using one of my patches as an example
to illustrate the iss
