Re: Multiple PowerPC BSPs Fail to BUIld

FWIW I am still waiting for an ACK on the fdset size increase patch to newlib. Once that's in place, I will bump the rtems-tools hash and newlib hash. --joel On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:16 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 11/3/2024 6:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > sorry for breaking the build. I fi

Re: Multiple PowerPC BSPs Fail to BUIld

On 11/3/2024 6:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > sorry for breaking the build. I fixed it. The problem is that > header file depends on the BSP-provided define BSP_SHARED_HANDLER_SUPPORT. So, > the include order matters. Thank you for quickly sorting this out. Chris ___

Re: Multiple PowerPC BSPs Fail to BUIld

Hello Joel, On 09.03.24 22:40, Joel Sherrill wrote: In looking at the build sweep log, I see what looks like motorola_powerpc and beatnik all have a common build failure that results in 53 configurations failing per https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2024-March/051698.html

Re: Multiple PowerPC BSPs Fail to BUIld

On 10/3/2024 8:40 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > In looking at the build sweep log, I see what looks like motorola_powerpc and > beatnik all have a common build failure that results in 53 configurations > failing per > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2024-March/051698.html > > This

Multiple PowerPC BSPs Fail to BUIld

Hi In looking at the build sweep log, I see what looks like motorola_powerpc and beatnik all have a common build failure that results in 53 configurations failing per https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2024-March/051698.html This is one but there are a lot. debug powerpc/mvme2307 build: