Re: Move arc4random support functions from libbsd to RTEMS

2017-11-16 Thread Gedare Bloom
I have no objections. Thank you! On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Christian Mauderer wrote: > Hello, > > are there any objections to the second version of the patches? > > That would be the following four for RTEMS: > > - https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2017-November/019500.html > - https

Re: Move arc4random support functions from libbsd to RTEMS

2017-11-16 Thread Christian Mauderer
Hello, are there any objections to the second version of the patches? That would be the following four for RTEMS: - https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2017-November/019500.html - https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2017-November/019503.html - https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2017

Move arc4random support functions from libbsd to RTEMS

2017-11-09 Thread Christian Mauderer
Moving the getentropy() and _arc4random_getentropy_fail() from libbsd to RTEMS makes it easier to implement hardware specific entropy sources. Beneath that it allows to use arc4random without libbsd. Note that this consists of two patch sets: One for RTEMS and one for libbsd. Kind regards Christ