On Thu, 30 May, 2019, 2:48 PM Aditya Upadhyay, wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:52 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:23 PM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:47 AM Aditya Upadhyay
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10
On Thu, 30 May, 2019, 12:52 AM Gedare Bloom, wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:23 PM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:47 AM Aditya Upadhyay
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:42 PM Vaibhav Gupta <
> vaibhavgupt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hell
On Thu, 30 May, 2019, 2:48 PM Aditya Upadhyay, wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:52 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:23 PM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:47 AM Aditya Upadhyay
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:52 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:23 PM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:47 AM Aditya Upadhyay
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:42 PM Vaibhav Gupta
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hello, okay I will ke
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:23 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:47 AM Aditya Upadhyay wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:42 PM Vaibhav Gupta
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello, okay I will keep that in mind.
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > But there is one problem with this
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:54 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Also the newlib community really appreciates it if we review the patches
> on the RTEMS development list first. When the patch is OK, then it can go
> to the newlib list.
>
Yeah, this is why I sent the patch on devel; for review.
>
> --joel
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:47 AM Aditya Upadhyay
wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:42 PM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, okay I will keep that in mind.
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > But there is one problem with this patch then.
> > .
> > .
> > If i just copy-paste ndbm.h, db.h(needed by n
Also the newlib community really appreciates it if we review the patches on
the RTEMS development list first. When the patch is OK, then it can go to
the newlib list.
--joel
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 12:12 PM Vaibhav Gupta
wrote:
> Hello, okay I will keep that in mind.
> .
> .
> .
> .
> But there
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:42 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
>
> Hello, okay I will keep that in mind.
> .
> .
> .
> .
> But there is one problem with this patch then.
> .
> .
> If i just copy-paste ndbm.h, db.h(needed by ndbm.h) and ndbm.c and make the
> entry of ndbm.c in Makefile.am.
> Then run 'aut
Hello, okay I will keep that in mind.
.
.
.
.
But there is one problem with this patch then.
.
.
If i just copy-paste ndbm.h, db.h(needed by ndbm.h) and ndbm.c and make the
entry of ndbm.c in Makefile.am.
Then run 'autoreconf' to add the entry for ndbm.c in Makefile.in. And then
run `make` comman
Hi Vaibhav,
You have sent a completely wrong patch. You do not need to include all
these files what are existed there. You should generate a patch for
your work like addition or modification or if you have added any other
file.
This patch should go to newlib mailing list. For your entire GSoC
per
11 matches
Mail list logo