Re: IOP changes impact on IPV4 Stack

2017-09-15 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 15/09/17 15:15, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 15/09/17 15:12, Joel Sherrill wrote: I haven't poured through the batch of email this morning. Are the changes in this set? I checked in the all patches today including the one for libbsd: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3132 You can now inte

Re: IOP changes impact on IPV4 Stack

2017-09-15 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 15/09/17 15:12, Joel Sherrill wrote: I haven't poured through the batch of email this morning. Are the changes in this set? I checked in the all patches today including the one for libbsd: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3132 -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr

Re: IOP changes impact on IPV4 Stack

2017-09-15 Thread Joel Sherrill
I haven't poured through the batch of email this morning. Are the changes in this set? Is there anywhere else this applies? Shared memory uses fds. On Sep 15, 2017 8:02 AM, "Sebastian Huber" < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello Joel, > > > On 15/09/17 01:41, Joel Sherrill wrote:

Re: IOP changes impact on IPV4 Stack

2017-09-15 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Joel, On 15/09/17 01:41, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi Sebastian The IPV4 stack allocates IOPs and maps fds to sockets in its implementation of system calls. Are these impacted by the recent changes? If so, you need to make sure to fix the handful of files impacted. thanks for the reminder.

IOP changes impact on IPV4 Stack

2017-09-14 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi Sebastian The IPV4 stack allocates IOPs and maps fds to sockets in its implementation of system calls. Are these impacted by the recent changes? If so, you need to make sure to fix the handful of files impacted. Thanks. --joel ___ devel mailing lis