On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
>
> On 24/04/15 09:11, Chris Johns wrote:
>>>
>>> >For the tools I propose to use GCC 4.9.3 (should get released soon) and
>>> >the next Newlib snapshot.
>>> >
>>
>> Snapshot name ?
>
>
> Its not available yet, but we are close to the end o
On 24/04/15 09:11, Chris Johns wrote:
>For the tools I propose to use GCC 4.9.3 (should get released soon) and
>the next Newlib snapshot.
>
Snapshot name ?
Its not available yet, but we are close to the end of the month.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-8
On 24/04/2015 5:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> With the fix for the POSIX thread join (it took only three years to fix
> the bug) I am done with 4.11. Everything else can wait after the branch.
Excellent and yes.
>
> For the tools I propose to use GCC 4.9.3 (should get released soon) and
> the
With the fix for the POSIX thread join (it took only three years to fix
the bug) I am done with 4.11. Everything else can wait after the branch.
For the tools I propose to use GCC 4.9.3 (should get released soon) and
the next Newlib snapshot.
On 24/04/15 02:39, Chris Johns wrote:
Hello,
I w
Hello,
I would like to propose we freeze the master branch in git and only
regressions are committed. Joel is intending to branch on Monday his
time if everything is ok but we need time to test before the branch is made.
If there are any objections please raise them otherwise I will assume
master
