Please Review GSOC proposal after recommended changes

I have made recommended changes in my proposal proposal ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: GSOC proposal - new POSIX APIs 2024

Hi! Requesting comments on my proposal for GSOC 2024 - implementing new POSIX APIs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iwgzx72TZ0aokNLww-y-IlyEkaRCovjGUhpdQXdP9mg/edit?usp=sharing Abhinav. -- *"Free society* *Has, at its core, privacy* *You must act in trust." - *Salyzyn

Seeking review for GSoC Proposal "Add RTEMS Framework to PlatformIO"

Please have a look at my project proposal for GSoC and suggest changes. Google Docs Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uyC1Eai73RET6lcWMkSe01FvcXWhceSD9_q4v8eYCCI/edit pdf for proposal attached below. GSOC2024_GUPTA_Add RTEMS Framework to PlatformIO (1).pdf Description: Adobe PDF documen

GSOC proposal: GSOC2024_Yang_Adding SPI and Watchdog support to Raspberry Pi4B BSP

Hello everyone, I've prepared a draft for my proposal. Please let me know how I could improve it. Thank you inadvance. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NjlUSWhqwUvrsQPBISU05ah0I0IGkEuq6BIThrkMBsg/edit?usp=sharing___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.o

GSoC Proposal Draft - Improve Raspberry Pi 4 BSP

I have drafted my GSoC proposal and uploaded it to Google Docs. You can leave suggestions as comments in the document. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dL5zl_iSYeyx6ZoOpKjy-CkLh_OvgGDJvblrPH5q6rg/edit?usp=sharing I apologize for not giving you much time for this review. Regards, Utkarsh

GSoC Proposal for Code Formatting and Style Check for RTEMS score

Hey there, the draft for my GSoC 2023 proposal is ready. It would be very helpful if anyone could review my proposal. All your suggestions are welcome. I have attached the link to my proposal below and opened it for suggestions. If there is any issue with the link, please do let me know. https://d

GSoC Proposal - Improve amd64 BSP

Hello all, I'm Siddharth Khattar, Please look at my first draft of the GSoC Proposal to improve the x64 BSP of RTEMS. I humbly request all to please take a look at it and comment any and all changes/improvements that can be improved upon in the proposal. The link to my proposal is:

GSOC Proposal - SiFive HiFive Unleashed RISC-V port for RTEMS

Hello everyone, I'm Amna Mannan, wanted to share my proposal for this year with you. I'll be to glad to know more about this proposal. I have updated the GSOC 2023 wiki. Here's a link to my proposal. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-RfydFwHBI5dvJKJu9TLpVI9wmVRcrqcTuHLJGBNTME/edit?usp=sharing T

[GSoC Proposal] Ethernet and SMP support for Raspberry Pi 4B AArch64

Hello everyone, I've drafted a proposal for GSoC 2023. All your help and review is appreciated. I'm a bit stuck on ideas for SMP, and I'll be glad to know further ideas for it. I've added the link to the gsoc 2023 wiki and added it here too. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aQq1kkpsRnuxTjaPGQpuU

Help for GSoC proposal

Hey there, I am thinking of taking #4628 for adding SATA support in libbsd for RTEMS as my GSoC 2023 Project. I have already done the Hello World patch and sent the screenshot to gedare and DrRTEMS. This is my first time in GSoC so it would be a great help if someone could guide me. Thanks & Regar

GSOC Proposal : Draft 3 Packaging Programming Language for RSB

Hello Everyone, Draft 3 of my proposal is ready. it can be accessed through https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J4J114C3CrCKEV2L5vgobT-mE0f2xQx2waJTrQ0tNLQ/edit?usp=sharing I would like to request everyone to review it for any changes or flaws Thanks - Eshan __

Gsoc Proposal : Packaging Programming Language Draft 2

Hello Everyone, I have tried to implement the received feedback on draft 1 into this draft. I would like everyone to look into this and tell how the proposal can be improved further. Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J4J114C3CrCKEV2L5vgobT-mE0f2xQx2waJTrQ0tNLQ/edit?usp=sharing -- Thanks

Review for gsoc proposal

I have incorporated the valuable suggestions of Dr Bloom in my proposal. Looking forward for any further suggestions. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OerM8Iix7PbDUCyb_J_KEzcMgLbvdqxd4FnK_BqI7XI/edit Thank you ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org

Re: Review for my GSOC proposal: Static analysis integration

Thanks I have added now. On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:00 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, 10:40 AM suyash singh > wrote: > >> Please review my proposal. Thank you >> >> This project is inspired by https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3710 and from >> the mail thread with subject >> "Im

Re: Review for my GSOC proposal: Static analysis integration

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, 10:40 AM suyash singh wrote: > Please review my proposal. Thank you > > This project is inspired by https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3710 and from > the mail thread with subject > "Improve Coverity Scan Integration: GSOC project details" > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d

Review for my GSOC proposal: Static analysis integration

Please review my proposal. Thank you This project is inspired by https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3710 and from the mail thread with subject "Improve Coverity Scan Integration: GSOC project details" https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OerM8Iix7PbDUCyb_J_KEzcMgLbvdqxd4FnK_BqI7XI/edit?usp=sharing ___

Re: GSoC Proposal : BeagleBoard project

Hi, Thanks for all the reviews and comments on the proposal! I have done all the changes according to the different comments and have also submitted the final pdf. I would really appreciate any further review or any comment, or any kind of fine tuning that might make it a bit better, before the de

Re: GSoC Proposal : BeagleBoard project

On 2/4/19 12:06 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 31/03/2019 03:57, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 31/3/19 5:05 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 5:09 PM Gedare Bloom >> > wrote: >>> >>> Remember you can submit your "Final" proposal many times on GSoC

Re: GSoC Proposal : BeagleBoard project

On 31/03/2019 03:57, Chris Johns wrote: On 31/3/19 5:05 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 5:09 PM Gedare Bloom mailto:ged...@rtems.org>> wrote: Remember you can submit your "Final" proposal many times on GSoC site. I made a few comments just regarding the 'public

Re: GSoC Proposal : BeagleBoard project

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:01 AM Christian Mauderer wrote: > Am 31.03.19 um 19:33 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 1:25 PM Christian Mauderer > > wrote: > > > > Am 31.03.19 um 09:08 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > > > > >

Re: GSoC Proposal : BeagleBoard project

Am 31.03.19 um 19:33 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 1:25 PM Christian Mauderer > wrote: > > Am 31.03.19 um 09:08 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 7:27 AM Chris Johns

Re: GSoC Proposal : BeagleBoard project

On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 1:25 PM Christian Mauderer wrote: > Am 31.03.19 um 09:08 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 7:27 AM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > > > On 31/3/19 5:05 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at

Re: GSoC Proposal : BeagleBoard project

Am 31.03.19 um 09:08 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 7:27 AM Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 31/3/19 5:05 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 5:09 PM Gedare Bloom > >

Re: GSoC Proposal : BeagleBoard project

On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 7:27 AM Chris Johns wrote: > On 31/3/19 5:05 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 5:09 PM Gedare Bloom > > wrote: > > > > Remember you can submit your "Final" proposal many times on GSoC > site. > > I made a few comm

Re: GSoC Proposal : BeagleBoard project

On 31/3/19 5:05 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 5:09 PM Gedare Bloom > wrote: > > Remember you can submit your "Final" proposal many times on GSoC site. > I made a few comments just regarding the 'public' view of your > project. I thi

Re: GSoC Proposal : BeagleBoard project

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 5:09 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Remember you can submit your "Final" proposal many times on GSoC site. > I made a few comments just regarding the 'public' view of your > project. I think the technical plan looks reasonable, and leave it to > the potential mentors to steer yo

Re: GSoC Proposal : BeagleBoard project

Remember you can submit your "Final" proposal many times on GSoC site. I made a few comments just regarding the 'public' view of your project. I think the technical plan looks reasonable, and leave it to the potential mentors to steer your technical path. Gedare On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 7:04 AM Vi

GSoC Proposal : BeagleBoard project

Hello, I have prepared the draft proposal and have signed up in the official GSoC site. Here is the link to the proposal https://docs.google.com/document/d/14UxH4KE5E3ME_PJZVBVGRgGjeWtSKafDpaQ70fe5Z8Q/edit?usp=sharing I would really appreciate any comments or feedback on the same. Thank you V

GSoC Proposal

Hello, I apologize for the late communication, and although the deadline has passed for official proposal submissions I would greatly appreciate any advice on my proposal for an STM32F446RE BSP. The proposal can be found on the GSoC Tracking Page or the l

Re: GSOC proposal - Runtime tracing

hi! > I think we should define some basic functionality which should be available ready to use during mid term evaluation. I want to avoid a last minute delivery during the project end with no time to fix problems after a review. This likely results in some half-finished work which nobody can use.

Re: GSOC proposal - Runtime tracing

On 23/03/18 16:28, Gedare Bloom wrote: Hello Vidushi, Sebastian: On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: Hello Vidushi, the RTEMS Trace Linker is definitely an interesting tool to track down difficult and specific issues. However, this is a nice to have optional out-of-box Tr

Re: GSOC proposal - Runtime tracing

Hi! I have uploaded my final proposal pdf for GSOC'18. I have tried to incorporate all the comments made. PFA the final draft of the proposal. Thanks for being such a wonderful community! I enjoyed every bit of the application process. Warm regards, Vidushi Vashishth ​ GSOC_proposal_Vidushi_ru

Re: GSOC proposal - Runtime tracing

Hello! >>We should focus on basic functionality and this is interrupt entry/exit and thread switching. This should work out of the box without having to compile RTEMS with specialized configuration options. It should work via a serial line and network (UDP I guess). It should also support SMP mach

Re: GSOC proposal - Runtime tracing

Hello Vidushi, Sebastian: On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Vidushi, > > the RTEMS Trace Linker is definitely an interesting tool to track down > difficult and specific issues. However, this is a nice to have optional out-of-box Trace Linker with integration to debu

Re: GSOC proposal - Runtime tracing

Hello Vidushi, the RTEMS Trace Linker is definitely an interesting tool to track down difficult and specific issues. However, this is a nice to have optional feature from my point of view. We should focus on basic functionality and this is interrupt entry/exit and thread switching. This should

GSOC proposal - Runtime tracing

Hi! I apologise for the delay in submission. Was caught up with college project submission. PFA my proposal application for GSOC'18. I would appreciate insight and suggestions. Best, Vidushi Vashishth ​ GSOC_proposal_Vidushi_runtime_tracing

[GSoC] Proposal Drafts

Aspiring GSoC Students, I made my first pass and comments over the draft proposals linked from https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2016 and you should please continue to improve your drafts as mentors will be reading them as time permits. If you have not started your proposal, you should be aiming t