On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Alan Cudmore wrote:
> Chris: The Model B V1.2 should work fine.
>
> I think I have one of each model Raspberry Pi, so I could test just about
> any Pi code.
> I just got my development environment up to date and tested the single core
> Pi ( A+ ) and Pi Zero. I ver
Chris: The Model B V1.2 should work fine.
I think I have one of each model Raspberry Pi, so I could test just about
any Pi code.
I just got my development environment up to date and tested the single core
Pi ( A+ ) and Pi Zero. I verified 4.11 and 4.12 work.
I also updated my RKI image ( github.co
On 27/04/2016 18:53, Pavel Pisa wrote:
I can help in this area but I have only RPi 1 for testing now.
I have a Model B - V1.2. Is this ok?
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello everybody
and especially those who want to work on RPi.
Before this sound of GSoC start, we should think
what should be integrated from YANG Qiao patches.
If you expect that mailbox services would be required
to access VideoCore and boot data then I think
that YANG Qiao work is valuable and
CCing Andre.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Martin Galvan
wrote:
> Hi everyone! Just wanted to check on the status for this project. I
> saw it was accepted for the GSoC 2016 (congratulations Mudit!), and
> would like to know what our workflow will be like. I offered to
> co-mentor it and help
Hi everyone! Just wanted to check on the status for this project. I
saw it was accepted for the GSoC 2016 (congratulations Mudit!), and
would like to know what our workflow will be like. I offered to
co-mentor it and help with code/documentation reviews, especially for
the SD card parts since I did