fs2 thread a point about licensing arose.
> >> Martin mentioned that the original code is part of Linux, assuming
> >> that it is GPLv2 (we'll check).
> >> However, Chris asked for a dual licensing scheme in order to include
> >> it in RTEMS.
> >>
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> On Dec 6, 2015 8:06 PM, "Daniel Gutson"
> wrote:
>>
>> In the f2fs/jffs2 thread a point about licensing arose.
>> Martin mentioned that the original code is part of Linux, assuming
>> that i
In the f2fs/jffs2 thread a point about licensing arose.
Martin mentioned that the original code is part of Linux, assuming
that it is GPLv2 (we'll check).
However, Chris asked for a dual licensing scheme in order to include
it in RTEMS.
I read in https://www.rtems.org/license/LICENSE &q
