https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2017-May/017824.html
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:24 PM, wrote:
> I should be following the status of the SPE support but haven’t, it’s an
> important platform for one of my clients. A little googling doesn’t make it
> clear how well the support is moving in
I should be following the status of the SPE support but haven’t, it’s an
important platform for one of my clients. A little googling doesn’t make it
clear how well the support is moving in to GCC 8, I only found again that it
would be a new target. Hopefully someone following GCC on the list h
On Feb 11, 2018 11:29 AM, "Peter Dufault" wrote:
What’s the context where -mno-spe is used? The last time I followed this
the SPE support in the powerpc target was to be discontinued and a
powerpcspe target was to be introduced.
It is in one of the PowerPC BSP family variants.
I don't know th
What’s the context where -mno-spe is used? The last time I followed this the
SPE support in the powerpc target was to be discontinued and a powerpcspe
target was to be introduced.
> On Feb 9, 2018, at 16:17 , Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am using GCC 8 to test my bsp_specs changes. On t
Hi
I am using GCC 8 to test my bsp_specs changes. On the
powerpc -mno-spe is gone.
I don't know of a case where we have a BSP that checks
if GCC supports an argument or not. I think we have just
changed the custom file when we upgraded GCC.
Any thoughts on the correct argument or better approac
