Re: Formal Verification within the ESA funded RTEMS-SMP qualification activity

2019-08-28 Thread Andrew Butterfield
Hi Joel, some quick (off the cuff) responses to your Qs: > > Assuming formal verification benefits from modular decomposition like software > construction and admitting I don't know how you plan to go about this, I would > tend to look at the APIs of interest and then look at what score > objec

Re: Formal Verification within the ESA funded RTEMS-SMP qualification activity

2019-08-28 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:50 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Hello Andrew, > > On 27/08/2019 16:58, Andrew Butterfield wrote: > > Dear RTEMS developers, qualifiers, > > > > I am involved with the ESA funded RTEMS (SMP) qualification activity, > > and I, with colleagues, will be exploring how form

Re: Formal Verification within the ESA funded RTEMS-SMP qualification activity

2019-08-27 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Andrew, On 27/08/2019 16:58, Andrew Butterfield wrote: Dear RTEMS developers, qualifiers, I am involved with the ESA funded RTEMS (SMP) qualification activity, and I, with colleagues, will be exploring how formal verification techniques can help. We will not "formally prove" all of RTE

Formal Verification within the ESA funded RTEMS-SMP qualification activity

2019-08-27 Thread Andrew Butterfield
Dear RTEMS developers, qualifiers, I am involved with the ESA funded RTEMS (SMP) qualification activity, and I, with colleagues, will be exploring how formal verification techniques can help. We will not "formally prove" all of RTEMS, but will focus on critical parts of the code, particularly t