> On Jul 16, 2015, at 15:07 , Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>> - I was having NFS crashes regularly. I removed a pthread_mutex_trylock()
>> in an ISR (I assumed that was safe) while trying to make that ISR faster and
>> the NFS issues disappeared. I haven’t had time to go back to that either.
>
On 7/16/2015 1:59 PM, Peter Dufault wrote:
On Jul 16, 2015, at 13:55 , Joel Sherrill wrote:
I am in the middle of a build sweep now with the tms570 patches
and my bsp.h changes. Once this finishes, I plan to push those
changes and cut the branch.
Speak now.
I have a two concerns but they
> On Jul 16, 2015, at 13:55 , Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> I am in the middle of a build sweep now with the tms570 patches
> and my bsp.h changes. Once this finishes, I plan to push those
> changes and cut the branch.
>
> Speak now.
I have a two concerns but they’ll have to be fixed after the bran
Hi
I am in the middle of a build sweep now with the tms570 patches
and my bsp.h changes. Once this finishes, I plan to push those
changes and cut the branch.
Speak now.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.comOn-Line Applications R
Hi
I plan to cut the branch tomorrow. This will provide
some time for folks to test on the branch and get any
last minute fixes in.
I plan to let the branch sit for until the week of July 27
before I cut 4.11.0.
This is because I will be in Hastings UK next week and don't
want to do this while
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 14/03/2015 12:30 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> I would like to consider landing the drvmgr and pci patch-set as a
>> sparc-specific feature (e.g. only included in builds for sparc.)
>
>
> How is this controlled or are you saying we state in
On 14/03/2015 12:30 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
I would like to consider landing the drvmgr and pci patch-set as a
sparc-specific feature (e.g. only included in builds for sparc.)
How is this controlled or are you saying we state in the release notes
this is only currently tested on SPARC BSPs ?
On March 13, 2015 8:30:46 AM CDT, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 11/03/2015 1:33 am, Amar Takhar wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we come up with a plan for branching 4.11?
>>>
>>> We need to push off any commit
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 1:33 am, Amar Takhar wrote:
>>
>> Can we come up with a plan for branching 4.11?
>>
>> We need to push off any commits made that are unrelated to tickets open in
>> milestone 4.11 to the next
On 13/03/15 06:04, Chris Johns wrote:
1. We need a suitable newlib snapshot to reference.
I have one pending Newlib patch, so the March snapshot would be nice.
This gives us two weeks from now to commit everything Newlib related.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornier
On 11/03/2015 1:33 am, Amar Takhar wrote:
Can we come up with a plan for branching 4.11?
We need to push off any commits made that are unrelated to tickets open in
milestone 4.11 to the next release. This way any changes we make have a narrow
scope.
This close to the release we should really
Can we come up with a plan for branching 4.11?
We need to push off any commits made that are unrelated to tickets open in
milestone 4.11 to the next release. This way any changes we make have a narrow
scope.
This close to the release we should really be in a slush period then a hard
close
12 matches
Mail list logo
