On 10/07/2014 6:09 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Jennifer,
I am about to go on vacation so I can only give some short comments.
Have fun.
This patch looks a bit like approach of the Timeline Tool from Edisoft:
http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/2007-October/017112.html
I am more in
Hello Jennifer,
I am about to go on vacation so I can only give some short comments.
This patch looks a bit like approach of the Timeline Tool from Edisoft:
http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/2007-October/017112.html
I am more in favor of linker based versions like:
http://www.rtems.org/w
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Jennifer Averett
wrote:
> The attached patches are a starting point for discussions for adding capture
> support
> to core objects. We started to write notes based on our discussions but the
> text
> was harder to follow than just writing some code and comm
The attached patches are a starting point for discussions for adding capture
support
to core objects. We started to write notes based on our discussions but the
text
was harder to follow than just writing some code and commenting on it. It is
hard
to see the impact of "word changes" versus rea
