TOFU:
Ok the patch is now in trunk, gcc-6 and gcc-5.
If possible, it would be good to move to the next gcc-6 snapshot when it
comes available.
Then, gnat should compile again with the rsb-4.12 tools.
Cheers,
Jan
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Jan Sommer
wrote:
Am 2016-05-27 14:44,
On 28/05/2016 01:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
No, we stopped to work on this since Chris was not so fond of it. I still
think its an improvement to move the POSIX header files to Newlib.
I agree with standards based headers being moved to newlib. My
understanding is this should be enough for
- Joel Sherrill schrieb:
> Did it again. :(
>
> Two days of moving with a rental truck must have be rusty. :(
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Jan Sommer
> wrote:
>
> > Am 2016-05-27 14:44, schrieb Joel Sherrill:
> >
> >> On May 27, 2016 7:17 AM, "Jan Sommer"
[...]
> > It probably sh
Did it again. :(
Two days of moving with a rental truck must have be rusty. :(
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Jan Sommer
wrote:
> Am 2016-05-27 14:44, schrieb Joel Sherrill:
>
>> On May 27, 2016 7:17 AM, "Jan Sommer"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> building the current tools (gcc-6) from
Am 2016-05-27 14:44, schrieb Joel Sherrill:
On May 27, 2016 7:17 AM, "Jan Sommer"
wrote:
Hello,
building the current tools (gcc-6) from master with Ada support fails.
I will try to post the patch for that to gcc over the weekend (@Joel I
hope you don't mind me putting you CC for that).
Plea
Used the wrong from address and it bounced to the list. :(
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Jan Sommer
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> building the current tools (gcc-6) from master with Ada support fails.
>
Is this the only branch that is broken? Or is the gcc master broken as well.
> I will try to post
Hello,
building the current tools (gcc-6) from master with Ada support fails.
I will try to post the patch for that to gcc over the weekend (@Joel I
hope you don't mind me putting you CC for that).
However as gcc-6.1 was just released a month ago, I guess it won't be
part of an official gcc-rel
