Re: [stm32f4] status of the bsp

2014-09-19 Thread Chris Nott
On good, thanks. I was hoping to work up to putting a tcpip stack on one of our STM32F4 boards with ethernet. I thought the BSD stack was the only option but LWIP would be ideal. Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com On 19 September 2014 19:23:33 Joel Sherrill wrote: There

Re: [stm32f4] status of the bsp

2014-09-19 Thread Joel Sherrill
There is a port of LWIP discussed recently on the list which would be very appropriate on lower memory targets. On September 19, 2014 9:21:02 PM CDT, Chris Nott wrote: >I have used the BSD stack with RTEMS on a project with Chris J. It is >fine >for some uses but it is very heavyweight for impl

Re: [stm32f4] status of the bsp

2014-09-19 Thread Chris Nott
I have used the BSD stack with RTEMS on a project with Chris J. It is fine for some uses but it is very heavyweight for implementing just a device on small embedded target. Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com On 19 September 2014 09:37:35 Gedare Bloom wrote: On Fri, Sep

Re: [stm32f4] status of the bsp

2014-09-19 Thread Tomasz Gregorek
2014-09-19 18:37 GMT+02:00 Gedare Bloom : > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Chris Nott wrote: > > Interrupts working yes. > > > > No I don't mind. It's a bit of a mess though, I was in the process of > doing > > another cleaner USB device implementation for BeagleBone Black, which I > was > > t

Re: [stm32f4] status of the bsp

2014-09-19 Thread Tomasz Gregorek
2014-09-19 18:26 GMT+02:00 Chris Nott : > Interrupts working yes. > > No I don't mind. It's a bit of a mess though, I was in the process of > doing another cleaner USB device implementation for BeagleBone Black, which > I was then going to backport to STM32F4 and eventually maybe work towards >

Re: [stm32f4] status of the bsp

2014-09-19 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Chris Nott wrote: > Interrupts working yes. > > No I don't mind. It's a bit of a mess though, I was in the process of doing > another cleaner USB device implementation for BeagleBone Black, which I was > then going to backport to STM32F4 and eventually maybe work

Re: [stm32f4] status of the bsp

2014-09-19 Thread Chris Nott
Interrupts working yes. No I don't mind. It's a bit of a mess though, I was in the process of doing another cleaner USB device implementation for BeagleBone Black, which I was then going to backport to STM32F4 and eventually maybe work towards some sort of general RTEMS USB device framework.

Re: [stm32f4] status of the bsp

2014-09-19 Thread Tomasz Gregorek
Hi Chris Yes, I am very interested. I guess you have interrupts working there? Do you mind your code or work based on it to end up under RTEMS licence on the git repository? Thanks 2014-09-19 6:00 GMT+02:00 Chris Nott : > Hi, I was fiddling with this platform and got as far as a project > imp

Re: [stm32f4] status of the bsp

2014-09-18 Thread Chris Nott
Hi, I was fiddling with this platform and got as far as a project implementing a USB device. If you are interested I could send you the code. It hasn't been touched for a while, it may or may not have bit rot. Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com On 18 September 2014 12:12

[stm32f4] status of the bsp

2014-09-18 Thread Tomasz Gregorek
Hello I am interested in development of the stm32f4 bsp. We have small project based on the STM32F429 MCPU which we would like to run RTEMS on. >From the current code one could say there is not much. Only UART in polling, started I2C, some defines and few registers descriptions, interrupts just t