Re: [rtems commit] libcsupport: Implement utimes() in terms of utimensat()

I can reproduce this. I think the test should change. The null file system operation handlers only set -1 and assume the caller will set errno. The utime methods which include a stat() or fstat() call depending on the signature and return ENOENT if that fails. utime() is considered obsolete but th

Re: [rtems commit] libcsupport: Implement utimes() in terms of utimensat()

On Tue, Jun 8, 2021, 5:11 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > one of these commits > > There are only 'skip'ped commits left to test. > The first bad commit could be any of: > bb7041230639894a924221ceb454d02c1ea84f66 > ea881bf7a15721916d4adcc5f117ebf6acc6d2

Re: [rtems commit] libcsupport: Implement utimes() in terms of utimensat()

Hello, one of these commits There are only 'skip'ped commits left to test. The first bad commit could be any of: bb7041230639894a924221ceb454d02c1ea84f66 ea881bf7a15721916d4adcc5f117ebf6acc6d2a3 335f7050822262f029e7945b31b0f2bb2d889bcc 6171a88d9c7f90bac9a076edf3655f7c9e2efb94 ea41722c92313e88436