On 10/1/2015 3:34 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 2/10/2015 9:15 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 10/1/2015 2:38 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 2/10/2015 8:33 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Why do you think it is wrong?
Because the check is for 'arm' and the file is 'mips'.
If I recall correctly, the MIPS
On 2/10/2015 9:15 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On 10/1/2015 2:38 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 2/10/2015 8:33 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Why do you think it is wrong?
>>
>> Because the check is for 'arm' and the file is 'mips'.
>
> If I recall correctly, the MIPS version is the most generic
On 10/1/2015 2:38 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 2/10/2015 8:33 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Why do you think it is wrong?
Because the check is for 'arm' and the file is 'mips'.
If I recall correctly, the MIPS version is the most generic
version and it is used for architectures which don't have
t
- Chris Johns schrieb:
> On 2/10/2015 8:33 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > Why do you think it is wrong?
>
> Because the check is for 'arm' and the file is 'mips'.
The mips variant is generic (C code only). There is no functional change.
Before this change we simply copied the file (one-t
On 2/10/2015 8:33 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Why do you think it is wrong?
Because the check is for 'arm' and the file is 'mips'.
Chris
>
> The background for this change is that we need an explicit one-to-one mapping
> of libbsd and original FreeBSD files.
>
> - Chris Johns schrieb:
>
Why do you think it is wrong?
The background for this change is that we need an explicit one-to-one mapping
of libbsd and original FreeBSD files.
- Chris Johns schrieb:
> On 1/10/2015 2:56 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > diff --git a/wscript b/wscript
> > index 673479f..88334e4 100644
> > --
On 1/10/2015 2:56 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> diff --git a/wscript b/wscript
> index 673479f..88334e4 100644
> --- a/wscript
> +++ b/wscript
> @@ -1053,42 +1053,41 @@ def build(bld):
>'rtemsbsd/telnetd/pty.c',
>'rtemsbsd/telnetd/telnetd.c']
> if bld.get_env()["
