Re: [Tracing] Deciding the Yaml configuration for barectf input

On 07/06/18 11:31, Vidushi Vashishth wrote: Hi! Quick question. I tried to modify the printk trace generator to print the output traces into a text file instead of the console. On running the normal link and trace linker commands there are no compilation errors. However when I run the applica

Re: [Tracing] Deciding the Yaml configuration for barectf input

Hi! Quick question. I tried to modify the printk trace generator to print the output traces into a text file instead of the console. On running the normal link and trace linker commands there are no compilation errors. However when I run the application executable using GDB it says [Inferior 1 (pr

Re: [Tracing] Deciding the Yaml configuration for barectf input

Hi Sebastian. > I still have problems to see the big picture. Would it be possible to > implement both approaches using a simple example? I am working on the babeltrace approach and using the fileio test case to track entry and exit of malloc, calloc, realloc and free functions. I will have som

Re: [Tracing] Deciding the Yaml configuration for barectf input

Hello Vidushi, I still have problems to see the big picture. Would it be possible to implement both approaches using a simple example? On 06/06/18 19:31, Vidushi Vashishth wrote: Hi! I have written a blog post  (https://vidushivashishth.github.io/sixthpost/

Re: [Tracing] Deciding the Yaml configuration for barectf input

Hey Guillaume! >I am wondering what tools are currently used for visualizing the resulting RTEMS trace, if any. And what are your plan on this aspect once you can output CTF traces with >RTEMS? RTEMS wiki pages do suggest using trace compass for the purpose of visualization of traces [1]. It seem

[Tracing] Deciding the Yaml configuration for barectf input

Hi! I have written a blog post (https://vidushivashishth.github.io/sixthpost/) summarizing two approaches to CTF generation that I can employ at this point. I prefer on working with the barectf approach. The only blocker that exists with this approach is deciding on a YAML configuration [1] for d