Re: [SPAM] Re: Self-contained one purpose objects

2015-07-23 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 23/07/15 13:51, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 7/23/2015 6:36 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 23/07/15 12:29, Chris Johns wrote: I feel this needs to be a real API not a pseudo-internal API. Making this an API means the project agrees to support the API, it has tests and we have to make sure it i

Re: [SPAM] Re: Self-contained one purpose objects

2015-07-23 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 7/23/2015 6:36 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 23/07/15 12:29, Chris Johns wrote: I feel this needs to be a real API not a pseudo-internal API. Making this an API means the project agrees to support the API, it has tests and we have to make sure it is working for a release. Oh and it has docu

Re: [SPAM] Re: Self-contained one purpose objects

2015-07-23 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 23/07/15 12:29, Chris Johns wrote: I feel this needs to be a real API not a pseudo-internal API. Making this an API means the project agrees to support the API, it has tests and we have to make sure it is working for a release. Oh and it has documentation. For an API I suggest to use C11/C++

[SPAM] Re: Self-contained one purpose objects

2015-07-23 Thread Chris Johns
Spam detection software, running on the system "corb.contemporary.net.au", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for deta