On 27/11/2018 16:24, Joel Sherrill wrote:
For the current license, we pointed people to a URL for the license
for the file. Why aren't we continuing that?
The BSD-2-Clause license is included completely in the file. There is
simply no need to reference a lengthy license text.
--
Sebastian Hu
For the current license, we pointed people to a URL for the license for the
file. Why aren't we continuing that?
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:43 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 27/11/2018 00:21, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > On 23/11/2018 07:55, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >> Copied from:
> >>
> >> https://sp
On 27/11/2018 00:21, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 23/11/2018 07:55, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> Copied from:
>>
>> https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause.html
>>
>> The formatting is suitable for C/C++ source comments.
>>
>> Update #3053.
>> ---
>> LICENSE.BSD-2-Clause | 39 +
On 23/11/2018 07:55, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Copied from:
https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause.html
The formatting is suitable for C/C++ source comments.
Update #3053.
---
LICENSE.BSD-2-Clause | 39 +++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
create mode 1006
Copied from:
https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause.html
The formatting is suitable for C/C++ source comments.
Update #3053.
---
LICENSE.BSD-2-Clause | 39 +++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 LICENSE.BSD-2-Clause
diff --git a/LICENSE.BSD