Martin,
Please send a v4 that applies over Sudarshan's patch (attached). Then
we can commit both.
Thanks!
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Is there a v4 missing?
>
>
> On 14/09/15 23:49, Martin Galvan wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone! Just checking in, was Sudarshan's patch com
Is there a v4 missing?
On 14/09/15 23:49, Martin Galvan wrote:
Hi everyone! Just checking in, was Sudarshan's patch commited?
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Martin's ticket works, and his commit can #close it.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:22 PM, sudarshan.rajagopalan
wro
Hi everyone! Just checking in, was Sudarshan's patch commited?
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Martin's ticket works, and his commit can #close it.
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:22 PM, sudarshan.rajagopalan
> wrote:
>> On 2015-08-31 13:39, Daniel Gutson wrote:
>>>
>>> On
Martin's ticket works, and his commit can #close it.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:22 PM, sudarshan.rajagopalan
wrote:
> On 2015-08-31 13:39, Daniel Gutson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd approve 2 patches in case you want to give credit. First patch
>>
On 2015-08-31 13:39, Daniel Gutson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
I'd approve 2 patches in case you want to give credit. First patch
with Sudarshan's fix, and Martin's improvement second.
+1
Sounds fair enough! :) Thanks for the support, Daniel. Should I make a
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I'd approve 2 patches in case you want to give credit. First patch
> with Sudarshan's fix, and Martin's improvement second.
+1
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Gutson
> wrote:
>> Side question to Joel and others: is this enough t
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I'd approve 2 patches in case you want to give credit. First patch
> with Sudarshan's fix, and Martin's improvement second.
Agreed. Sudarshan sent his patch a couple days ago; I'll generate a
new one with the new instructions and the comments
I'd approve 2 patches in case you want to give credit. First patch
with Sudarshan's fix, and Martin's improvement second.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Gutson
wrote:
> Side question to Joel and others: is this enough to credit Sudarshan?
> He did an amazing job for finding the bug and p
Side question to Joel and others: is this enough to credit Sudarshan?
He did an amazing job for finding the bug and proposing an initial
solution.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Martin Galvan
wrote:
> On exception entry, _ARMV7M_Exception_default stores the previous Stack
> Pointer
> in a CPU
On exception entry, _ARMV7M_Exception_default stores the previous Stack Pointer
in a CPU_Exception_frame. The SP can be MSP or PSP, depending on the mode
in which the exception was taken. To know this, we must check the value of LR.
Right now the code checks whether it should store MSP or PSP by c
10 matches
Mail list logo