Re: [PATCH v2] port ndbm

2019-07-09 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 10:28 PM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 8:32 PM Vaibhav Gupta > wrote: > >> --- >> newlib/libc/include/ndbm.h | 84 + >> newlib/libc/search/Makefile.am | 1 + >> newlib/libc/search/ndbm.c | 215 +

Re: [PATCH v2] port ndbm

2019-07-09 Thread Aditya Upadhyay
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 8:32 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > --- > newlib/libc/include/ndbm.h | 84 + > newlib/libc/search/Makefile.am | 1 + > newlib/libc/search/ndbm.c | 215 + > 3 files changed, 300 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 newlib/lib

Re: [PATCH v2] port ndbm

2019-06-26 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
I even tried: $ cd /home/varodek/development/newlib/b-sparc-rtems5-newlib/sparc-rtems5/newlib/libc/posix $ sparc-rtems5-nm -A ./*.o | grep lib_a-ndbm.o Output << ./lib_a-ndbm.o: T dbm_clearerr ./lib_a-ndbm.o: T dbm_close ./lib_a-ndbm.o: T dbm_delete ./lib_a-ndbm.o: T

Re: [PATCH v2] port ndbm

2019-06-26 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:24 AM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:14 AM Vaibhav Gupta > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:08 AM Aditya Upadhyay > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:11 AM Vaibhav Gupta > wrote: > >> > > >> > Hello Gedare, > >> > as you

Re: [PATCH v2] port ndbm

2019-06-26 Thread Aditya Upadhyay
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:14 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:08 AM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:11 AM Vaibhav Gupta >> wrote: >> > >> > Hello Gedare, >> > as you suggested, to use the group name of patch as 'newlib'. >> > I did that and then

Re: [PATCH v2] port ndbm

2019-06-26 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:08 AM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:11 AM Vaibhav Gupta > wrote: > > > > Hello Gedare, > > as you suggested, to use the group name of patch as 'newlib'. > > I did that and then removed the line"%patch setup newlib -p1" > > It has generated ndbm

Re: [PATCH v2] port ndbm

2019-06-26 Thread Aditya Upadhyay
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:11 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > Hello Gedare, > as you suggested, to use the group name of patch as 'newlib'. > I did that and then removed the line"%patch setup newlib -p1" > It has generated ndbm.h in include directory. > You are applying the patches to RSB just for

Re: [PATCH v2] port ndbm

2019-06-26 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
Hello Gedare, as you suggested, to use the group name of patch as 'newlib'. I did that and then removed the line"%patch setup newlib -p1" It has generated ndbm.h in include directory. Vaibhav Gupta On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 8:41 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 8:35 PM Va

Re: [PATCH v2] port ndbm

2019-06-26 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 8:35 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > Hello, > > Newlib is compiling successfully. > But when i applied patch to RSB. It is not generating ndbm.h > inside rtems/5/sparc-rtem5/include this time. > > I am following same steps again which I followed that day when ndbm.h wa

Re: [PATCH v2] port ndbm

2019-06-26 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
Hello, Newlib is compiling successfully. But when i applied patch to RSB. It is not generating ndbm.h inside rtems/5/sparc-rtem5/include this time. I am following same steps again which I followed that day when ndbm.h was successfully generated. Below are the log files generated by

[PATCH v2] port ndbm

2019-06-26 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
--- newlib/libc/include/ndbm.h | 84 + newlib/libc/search/Makefile.am | 1 + newlib/libc/search/ndbm.c | 215 + 3 files changed, 300 insertions(+) create mode 100644 newlib/libc/include/ndbm.h create mode 100644 newlib/libc/search/ndbm.c d