Re: [PATCH v1] Add steps to test Newlib patch.

2019-08-17 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
t;> > -Vaibhav > >> > > >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, 7:58 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Then this should be sent with -v2. > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 1:33 PM Vaibhav Gupta < > vaibhavgupt.

Re: [PATCH v1] Add steps to test Newlib patch.

2019-08-16 Thread Joel Sherrill
used -v1. >> > Sending a new one with -v2. >> > >> > -Vaibhav >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, 7:58 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> >> >> Then this should be sent with -v2. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at

Re: [PATCH v1] Add steps to test Newlib patch.

2019-08-16 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
> > -Vaibhav > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, 7:58 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> > >> Then this should be sent with -v2. > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 1:33 PM Vaibhav Gupta > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > >

Re: [PATCH v1] Add steps to test Newlib patch.

2019-08-16 Thread Gedare Bloom
gt; >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:51 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> >> >> Is this a duplicate of the other "patch v1 Add steps to test Newlib >> >> patch." or this one replaces it? >> > >> > This one

Re: [PATCH v1] Add steps to test Newlib patch.

2019-08-16 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
t; > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:51 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> > >> Is this a duplicate of the other "patch v1 Add steps to test Newlib > patch." or this one replaces it? > > > > This one replaces it. Actually I replaced all the previous ones with >

Re: [PATCH v1] Add steps to test Newlib patch.

2019-08-16 Thread Gedare Bloom
Then this should be sent with -v2. On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 1:33 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:51 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> Is this a duplicate of the other "patch v1 Add steps to test Newlib patch." >> or this one replaces

Re: [PATCH v1] Add steps to test Newlib patch.

2019-08-15 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:51 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Is this a duplicate of the other "patch v1 Add steps to test Newlib > patch." or this one replaces it? > This one replaces it. Actually I replaced all the previous ones with mine. The commands, steps I have written are b

Re: [PATCH v1] Add steps to test Newlib patch.

2019-08-15 Thread Gedare Bloom
Is this a duplicate of the other "patch v1 Add steps to test Newlib patch." or this one replaces it? On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:45 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > Update the checksum to be used for the Newlib patches. > Earlier it was msd5, but it is depreciated for security &g

[PATCH v1] Add steps to test Newlib patch.

2019-08-14 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
Update the checksum to be used for the Newlib patches. Earlier it was msd5, but it is depreciated for security reasons. Now RSB accepts sha512. --- user/rsb/project-sets.rst | 41 +-- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/rsb/projec

[PATCH v1] Add steps to test Newlib patch.

2019-08-12 Thread Vaibhav Gupta
Update the checksum to be used for the Newlib patches. Earlier it was msd5, but it is depreciated for security reasons. Now RSB accepts sha512. --- user/rsb/project-sets.rst | 41 +-- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/rsb/projec