On 11/11/22 8:36 am, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> This should be covered by COPYING.rtemslwip. I would say it isn't worth
> putting
> it in the intentionally empty files.
Agreed. Copyright of "empty" does not make sense.
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rte
This should be covered by COPYING.rtemslwip. I would say it isn't worth
putting it in the intentionally empty files.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 2:22 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> Do we need copyright statements for these files?
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 9:49 PM Kinsey Moor
Looks good to me.
Do we need copyright statements for these files?
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 9:49 PM Kinsey Moore wrote:
>
> ---
> rtemslwip/bsd_compat_include/arpa/nameser.h | 1 +
> rtemslwip/bsd_compat_include/machine/rtems-bsd-kernel-space.h | 1 +
> rtemslwip/bsd_compat_incl
---
rtemslwip/bsd_compat_include/arpa/nameser.h | 1 +
rtemslwip/bsd_compat_include/machine/rtems-bsd-kernel-space.h | 1 +
rtemslwip/bsd_compat_include/machine/rtems-bsd-user-space.h | 1 +
rtemslwip/bsd_compat_include/net/if_var.h | 1 +
rtemslwip/bsd_comp
