Thanks, good luck :)
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 7:19 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> Hello Gedare,
>
> I created a ticket for this in FreeBSD (I really hope I picked the right
> way for this). I'll wait whether it needs some adaption and then re-send
> an adapted patch for libbsd as soon as I have
Hello Gedare,
I created a ticket for this in FreeBSD (I really hope I picked the right
way for this). I'll wait whether it needs some adaption and then re-send
an adapted patch for libbsd as soon as I have a version that is accepted
in FreeBSD.
Best regards
Christian
On 10/09/2020 09:05, Christ
Hello Gedare,
I'll have to rework some parts (the ones where I checked for the BSP)
but I'll try.
Best regards
Christian
On 09/09/2020 17:58, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Can this be pushed upstream in a non-RTEMS specific way?
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:16 AM Christian Mauderer
> wrote:
>>
>> Som
Can this be pushed upstream in a non-RTEMS specific way?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:16 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> Some bits are in the wrong order. Beneath that, the interrupts can occur
> in an unexpected order. The DATA_AVAIL interrupt can occur at the same
> time as the DMA interrupt (or s
Some bits are in the wrong order. Beneath that, the interrupts can occur
in an unexpected order. The DATA_AVAIL interrupt can occur at the same
time as the DMA interrupt (or slightly before it). With that, the DMA
and PIO interrupt handling doesn't work well together. Beneath that the
DMA interrupt
