On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:52 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021, 5:23 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:18 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> >
>> > It is preferred not to add patches to our repos when you can reference the
>> > upstream to fetch it. You s
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021, 5:23 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:18 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > It is preferred not to add patches to our repos when you can reference
> the upstream to fetch it. You should be able to reference the URL where the
> "raw" view of the patch
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:18 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> It is preferred not to add patches to our repos when you can reference the
> upstream to fetch it. You should be able to reference the URL where the "raw"
> view of the patch is.
>
Thanks for reviewing. The issue with that was that I was g
It is preferred not to add patches to our repos when you can reference the
upstream to fetch it. You should be able to reference the URL where the
"raw" view of the patch is.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:56 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> Close #4366
> ---
> rtems/config/tools/rtems-gdb-9.1-1.cfg
Close #4366
---
rtems/config/tools/rtems-gdb-9.1-1.cfg| 3 +
.../patches/gdb-9-1-linker-error-fix.diff | 67 +++
2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 source-builder/patches/gdb-9-1-linker-error-fix.diff
diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gdb-9.1-1.
