On September 19, 2014 7:28:36 AM CDT, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>On 08/07/14 22:52, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> There was a lot of duplication between the discipline subroutines.
>> With the transition to RBTrees for priority discipline, there were
>> only a few lines of source code manipulating the d
On 08/07/14 22:52, Joel Sherrill wrote:
There was a lot of duplication between the discipline subroutines.
With the transition to RBTrees for priority discipline, there were
only a few lines of source code manipulating the data structure
for FIFO and priority. Thus is made sense to fold these bac
There was a lot of duplication between the discipline subroutines.
With the transition to RBTrees for priority discipline, there were
only a few lines of source code manipulating the data structure
for FIFO and priority. Thus is made sense to fold these back
into the main methods.
As part of doing