On 12/07/17 08:06, Chris Johns wrote:
On 12/07/2017 15:35, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 11/07/17 17:06, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Is there a reason someone might have to not want one server per core
when using SMP? That is, should this be configurable?
Yes, this should be configurable. One option is
On 12/07/2017 15:35, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 11/07/17 17:06, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>> Is there a reason someone might have to not want one server per core
>> when using SMP? That is, should this be configurable?
>
> Yes, this should be configurable. One option is to add an alternative
> initi
On 11/07/17 17:06, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Is there a reason someone might have to not want one server per core
when using SMP? That is, should this be configurable?
Yes, this should be configurable. One option is to add an alternative
initialization routine that uses a configuration table. Howev
There should probably be a ticket for this change.
Is there a reason someone might have to not want one server per core
when using SMP? That is, should this be configurable?
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> This allows load balancing of interrupt processing in SMP
> conf
This allows load balancing of interrupt processing in SMP
configurations.
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/shared/src/irq-server.c | 263 +--
cpukit/include/rtems/irq-extension.h | 129 ---
2 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
diff --git a/c/src/lib
