On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Christian Mauderer
wrote:
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
>> Von: "Gedare Bloom"
>> An: "Christian Mauderer"
>> CC: devel@rtems.org
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 10. November 2017 17:14:38
>> Betreff: Re: [PATCH 3/4
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Gedare Bloom"
> An: "Christian Mauderer"
> CC: devel@rtems.org
> Gesendet: Freitag, 10. November 2017 17:14:38
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH 3/4] getentropy: Add test.
> This is a necessary test, but I don't think it is t
This is a necessary test, but I don't think it is that sufficient to
give a good idea of the quality of the entropy returned. It would be
better instead to calculate an actual entropy (information theoretic)
measure over multiple calls to getentropy(). The program test logic
could be something like
From: Christian Mauderer
---
testsuites/libtests/Makefile.am | 1 +
testsuites/libtests/configure.ac | 1 +
testsuites/libtests/random01/Makefile.am | 19 ++
testsuites/libtests/random01/init.c | 105 ++
testsuites/libtests/random01/
