On 24/08/14 11:42, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello Sebastian,
On Sunday 24 of August 2014 10:54:15 Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08/22/2014 10:14 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
+RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE bool rtems_clock_ticks_before(
+ rtems_interval ticks
+)
+{
+ return ( (int32_t) ticks - (int32_t) _Watchdog_Tic
On August 24, 2014 7:28:32 AM EDT, Chris Johns wrote:
>On 24/08/2014 6:57 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 08/24/2014 05:02 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
>>>
>>> The calls names make sense from a programming point of view but from
>a
>>> user point of view they are sort of forwards and backwards. For
>
On 24/08/2014 6:57 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08/24/2014 05:02 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
The calls names make sense from a programming point of view but from a
user point of view they are sort of forwards and backwards. For
example rtems_clock_ticks_later_us is the "the clock tick so many
micro
Hello Sebastian,
On Sunday 24 of August 2014 10:54:15 Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 08/22/2014 10:14 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> >>> +RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE bool rtems_clock_ticks_before(
> >>>
> >>> > >+ rtems_interval ticks
> >>> > >+)
> >>> > >+{
> >>> > >+ return ( (int32_t) ticks - (int32_t) _Watch
On 08/24/2014 05:02 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 23/08/2014 1:12 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Add rtems_clock_ticks_later(), rtems_clock_ticks_later_us() and
rtems_clock_ticks_later_us().
FIXME: Patch is incomplete. Documentation and tests are missing. Just
for API review.
---
cpukit/rtems/inclu
On 08/22/2014 10:14 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
+RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE bool rtems_clock_ticks_before(
> >+ rtems_interval ticks
> >+)
> >+{
> >+ return ( (int32_t) ticks - (int32_t) _Watchdog_Ticks_since_boot ) > 0;
>
>Why not just return _Watchdog_Ticks_since_boot < ticks;
Yes, this doesn't work i
On 23/08/2014 1:12 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Add rtems_clock_ticks_later(), rtems_clock_ticks_later_us() and
rtems_clock_ticks_later_us().
FIXME: Patch is incomplete. Documentation and tests are missing. Just
for API review.
---
cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/clock.h | 66
On Friday 22 of August 2014 17:24:41 Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Sebastian Huber
>
> wrote:
> > Add rtems_clock_ticks_later(), rtems_clock_ticks_later_us() and
> > rtems_clock_ticks_later_us().
> >
> > FIXME: Patch is incomplete. Documentation and tests are missing. J
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Add rtems_clock_ticks_later(), rtems_clock_ticks_later_us() and
> rtems_clock_ticks_later_us().
>
> FIXME: Patch is incomplete. Documentation and tests are missing. Just
> for API review.
> ---
> cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/clock.h
These also would go into the clockimpl.h
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Add rtems_clock_ticks_later(), rtems_clock_ticks_later_us() and
> rtems_clock_ticks_later_us().
>
> FIXME: Patch is incomplete. Documentation and tests are missing. Just
> for API review.
> ---
>
Add rtems_clock_ticks_later(), rtems_clock_ticks_later_us() and
rtems_clock_ticks_later_us().
FIXME: Patch is incomplete. Documentation and tests are missing. Just
for API review.
---
cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/clock.h | 66
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+
11 matches
Mail list logo