On 28/10/17 7:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Can I go ahead? There is a lot more to do to get good test results without a
> console driver.
Yes. Sorry I did not directly say that.
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mai
Hello Chris,
Can I go ahead? There is a lot more to do to get good test results without a
console driver.
- Chris Johns schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series looks good and thank you for making move. I had planned on
> moving to this point once I knew printk change gave me suitable test res
On 27/10/2017 14:50, Chris Johns wrote:
>
> Does this mean the TEST_INIT defines can be removed? I can do this after I
> have
> tested this change.
>
Sorry missed the patch to remove them in the series.
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
ht
Hi,
This patch series looks good and thank you for making move. I had planned on
moving to this point once I knew printk change gave me suitable test results on
the zedboard.
Does this mean the TEST_INIT defines can be removed? I can do this after I have
tested this change.
Chris
___
Statically initialize it to use printk().
Update #3170.
Update #3199.
---
cpukit/include/rtems/bspIo.h | 6 ++
cpukit/libcsupport/src/printk_plugin.c| 4 ++--
cpukit/libmisc/testsupport/testbeginend.c | 7 ++-
testsuites/libtests/capture01/init.c | 1 -
testsuites/li
