Re: [PATCH 1/6] Patches for the OR1k CPU handling and definitions

2016-02-20 Thread Gedare Bloom
com > Cc: rtems-de...@rtems.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Patches for the OR1k CPU handling and definitions > >>Hi Jakob, >> >>I should have mentioned yesterday that you ought to open one or more >>tickets on our Trac (devel.rtems.org) and then reference those tickets >

RE: [PATCH 1/6] Patches for the OR1k CPU handling and definitions

2016-02-20 Thread Jakob Viketoft
Hello Gedare, From: devel [devel-boun...@rtems.org] on behalf of Gedare Bloom [ged...@rtems.org] Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 14:23 To: jakob.viket...@gmail.com Cc: rtems-de...@rtems.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Patches for the OR1k CPU handling and

Re: [PATCH 1/6] Patches for the OR1k CPU handling and definitions

2016-02-20 Thread Gedare Bloom
Hi Jakob, I should have mentioned yesterday that you ought to open one or more tickets on our Trac (devel.rtems.org) and then reference those tickets in your commit messages using e.g. "updates #" or "fixes #". Also, if your test cases are suitably generic and useful, you might consider p

[PATCH 1/6] Patches for the OR1k CPU handling and definitions

2016-02-20 Thread jakob . viketoft
From: Jakob Viketoft --- cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c | 18 +- cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/rtems/score/cpu.h | 47 ++--- cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/rtems/score/or1k-utility.h | 244 -- 3 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) diff --git a/cp