Re: [PATCH 1/2] libcsupport: Delete malloc statistics

2014-11-28 Thread Gedare Bloom
Great, thanks for doing this, the stats look a lot cleaner to me. On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 27/11/14 16:40, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> Any particular reason for dropping memalign_calls? > > > If you are interested in particular function calls, then I suggest to u

Re: [PATCH 1/2] libcsupport: Delete malloc statistics

2014-11-28 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 27/11/14 16:40, Gedare Bloom wrote: Any particular reason for dropping memalign_calls? If you are interested in particular function calls, then I suggest to use some sort of tracing. Any other stats get dropped? I added the dropped stats to the Heap_Statistics: http://git.rtems.org/r

Re: [PATCH 1/2] libcsupport: Delete malloc statistics

2014-11-27 Thread Gedare Bloom
Any particular reason for dropping memalign_calls? Any other stats get dropped? On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Use the heap handler statistics instead. Add heap walk option to MALLOC > shell command. > > close #1367 > --- > cpukit/libcsupport/Makefile.am

[PATCH 1/2] libcsupport: Delete malloc statistics

2014-11-27 Thread Sebastian Huber
Use the heap handler statistics instead. Add heap walk option to MALLOC shell command. close #1367 --- cpukit/libcsupport/Makefile.am | 7 +- cpukit/libcsupport/include/rtems/malloc.h | 63 - cpukit/libcsupport/src/calloc.c| 5 --