On 07/11/2017 08:49, Chris Johns wrote:
>> Why can't we use a Git post-checkout hook (attached)?
>
> I tend to get a little uneasy when a VC tool is touching code in a project
> underneath another operation. It makes auditing more complicated. If you think
> the autoconf change is still not suitab
On 06/11/2017 17:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> How reliable is this Autoconf stuff?
Haha, that is a leading question! I suppose it depends on how you use it or
abuse it as we have in our case.
> Do I have to re-build everything after each
> Git checkout (cpuopts.h is included in nearly every head
How reliable is this Autoconf stuff? Do I have to re-build everything
after each Git checkout (cpuopts.h is included in nearly every header)?
Why can't we use a Git post-checkout hook (attached)?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone
Update #3217.
---
cpukit/aclocal/git-version.m4 | 16
cpukit/aclocal/rtems-top.m4 | 7 ---
cpukit/configure.ac | 2 +-
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 cpukit/aclocal/git-version.m4
diff --git a/cpukit/aclocal/git-version.m4