Re: [PATCH 09/45] score: New timer server implementation

2015-05-18 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 17/05/15 04:36, Gedare Bloom wrote: -/* FIXME: This locking approach for SMP is improvable! */ + ++watchdogs->generation; We should probably try to file a ticket associated with any FIXME type comments, and refer to it in the FIXME too. Yes, in this case it is: https://devel.rtems.org/ti

Re: [PATCH 09/45] score: New timer server implementation

2015-05-16 Thread Gedare Bloom
> -/* FIXME: This locking approach for SMP is improvable! */ > + ++watchdogs->generation; > We should probably try to file a ticket associated with any FIXME type comments, and refer to it in the FIXME too. ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://l

[PATCH 09/45] score: New timer server implementation

2015-05-15 Thread Sebastian Huber
Use mostly the standard watchdog operations. Use a system event for synchronization. This implementation is simpler and offers better SMP performance. Close #2131. --- cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/event.h | 5 + cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/timerimpl.h | 51 +- cpukit