Thanks. All pushed.
Hopefully the next batch will not be that difficult.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 2:12 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 1/3/22 3:08 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > This series of relicense changes looks good. Thanks for getting this
> > cleaned up. I think you can push it.
>
> +1
>
> Thank
On 1/3/22 3:08 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> This series of relicense changes looks good. Thanks for getting this
> cleaned up. I think you can push it.
+1
Thanks
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
This series of relicense changes looks good. Thanks for getting this
cleaned up. I think you can push it.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 5:23 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> This large series of patches is mechanical and almost completely
> generated by a script. I focused on directories where all authors
>
This large series of patches is mechanical and almost completely
generated by a script. I focused on directories where all authors
had given permission. There are other directories in cpukit/ which
are not third-party code which should also be able to be updated.
I will follow up later with changes
