Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add test suite to validate performance requirements

2020-11-15 Thread Chris Johns
On 14/11/20 11:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 13/11/2020 20:21, Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> I didn't really raise this in your other threads related to >> performance, but how are we (RTEMS Project) defining performance >> requirements? Are these simply the performance values we get by >> running

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add test suite to validate performance requirements

2020-11-14 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 13/11/2020 20:21, Gedare Bloom wrote: I didn't really raise this in your other threads related to performance, but how are we (RTEMS Project) defining performance requirements? Are these simply the performance values we get by running the tests on our release? Do we aim to hit certain targets

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add test suite to validate performance requirements

2020-11-13 Thread Gedare Bloom
I didn't really raise this in your other threads related to performance, but how are we (RTEMS Project) defining performance requirements? Are these simply the performance values we get by running the tests on our release? Do we aim to hit certain targets and reject patches if they don't? Or do we

[PATCH 0/8] Add test suite to validate performance requirements

2020-11-13 Thread Sebastian Huber
This patch set introduces a test suite for runtimer performance validation tests and a test case for the Partition Manager. Sebastian Huber (8): libtest: Make test case allocator configurable libtest: Simplify runtime measurement support libtest: Add primitive test case memory allocator li