Re: [PATCH] validation: Fix CallWithinISR()

2022-06-08 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 08/06/2022 22:11, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 1:04 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: On 08/06/2022 17:40, Gedare Bloom wrote: Hm. This looks ok, but it also seems to be a bit of an awkward requirement. Is this only relevant for the tm27 test? I hijacked the tm27 support to add an A

Re: [PATCH] validation: Fix CallWithinISR()

2022-06-08 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 1:04 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 08/06/2022 17:40, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > Hm. This looks ok, but it also seems to be a bit of an awkward > > requirement. Is this only relevant for the tm27 test? > > I hijacked the tm27 support to add an API for software interrupts. > D

Re: [PATCH] validation: Fix CallWithinISR()

2022-06-08 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 08/06/2022 17:40, Gedare Bloom wrote: Hm. This looks ok, but it also seems to be a bit of an awkward requirement. Is this only relevant for the tm27 test? I hijacked the tm27 support to add an API for software interrupts. -- embedded brains GmbH Herr Sebastian HUBER Dornierstr. 4 82178 Puch

Re: [PATCH] validation: Fix CallWithinISR()

2022-06-08 Thread Gedare Bloom
Hm. This looks ok, but it also seems to be a bit of an awkward requirement. Is this only relevant for the tm27 test? On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 8:01 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Some BSPs require that Clear_tm27_intr() is called in the interrupt > service routine. > > Update #3269. > --- > testsuit

[PATCH] validation: Fix CallWithinISR()

2022-06-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
Some BSPs require that Clear_tm27_intr() is called in the interrupt service routine. Update #3269. --- testsuites/validation/tx-call-within-isr.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/testsuites/validation/tx-call-within-isr.c b/testsuites/validation/tx-call-within-isr.c index 22