On 26/09/2020 17:50, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Why the __ around RTEMS_ADA and no other option?
There is a one to one correspondence between the BSP option name and the
define in .
I think the first order of business is to explain how to translate
existing configure and build steps to the new one
Why the __ around RTEMS_ADA and no other option?
I think the first order of business is to explain how to translate existing
configure and build steps to the new one. I think adding a simple example
with a couple of enable/disable and the corresponding waf would help. Every
user has to face this.
> On 26 Sep 2020, at 1:17 am, Sebastian Huber
> wrote:
>
> On 25/09/2020 17:12, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>>> +Migration from Autoconf/Automake
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +The Autoconf/Automake based build system used a ``configure`` command to
>>> +configure a single BSP and
On 25/09/2020 17:12, Gedare Bloom wrote:
+Migration from Autoconf/Automake
+
+
+The Autoconf/Automake based build system used a ``configure`` command to
+configure a single BSP and ``make`` to build it. The ``configure`` command is
You can make multiple BSPs, so
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:44 PM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> Update #3818.
> ---
> user/bld/index.rst | 84 --
> 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/user/bld/index.rst b/user/bld/index.rst
> index b47cee8..376475c 100644
> -
Update #3818.
---
user/bld/index.rst | 84 --
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/bld/index.rst b/user/bld/index.rst
index b47cee8..376475c 100644
--- a/user/bld/index.rst
+++ b/user/bld/index.rst
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
.. SPDX-
